Home > Rewriting PedoTransfer Rules > Drainage rule > Available information

Rewriting PTR salinity, alkalinity, chemical toxicity and drainage based on the wrb-standard

Review of available information in the SGDBE


Attribute WR

In the SGDBE, the attribute WR gives information about the water regime of the STU following 4 classes. This attribute gives information about the duration and the depth where the soil is saturated by water during the year. The relation between the values of this attribute and the drainage classes used for CGMS is given in Table 4-21. The class 4 of WR is corresponding to the VP (very poorly drained) class used in CGMS. But for the other classes of WR, there are several CGMS classes that correspond. For these WR classes, it is necessary to use other information to choose which CGMS class corresponds. To do so, the information from the soil name (FAO85- FULL, FAO90-FULL and WRB-FULL) and the agricultural limitations (AGLIM1, AGLIM2) will be used. These attributes will also be used when WR is not given (that is the case for all the data coming from the Digital Soil Map of the World).

Table 4-21: Links between the WR attribute of the SGDBE and the CGMS drainage classes (see 4-20)

The current CGMS rule for drainage class on the part of the SGDBE where soil names were given in the FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend is evaluated. Note that not each individual record is compared separately. First, all records of the CGMS rule have been applied. Thus, for example, not all Gleysols will receive value ‘P’; only the STUs that have not been assigned ‘W’ or ‘VP’ because of a drained or flooded phase.

For each occurrence of the rule, the values taken by the WR attribute (except when WR = 0) were counted (Table 4-22). Some occurrences show a good correlation with WR:

The occurrences using the phase are generally dispatched in several WR classes. This result is not surprising because phases are generally not well defined. Moreover, the use of phases was very heterogeneous from one country to another.

Some soil types have more or less a high variability in their water regime:

Table 4-22: WR values for each occurrence of the current CGMS rule for drainage for STUs with an original soil name in FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend (in % of the number of STUs by occurrence)

Attribute FAO85-FULL

In the FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend, the water regime of soils is described by:

The different soil names for which one or more of these characteristics are present, or are not allowed, are listed in Table 4-23.

Table 4-23: Moisture regime information contained in the definition of soil names in the FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend

Hydromorphic properties mark soils showing one or more of the following properties:

For some soil groups, the presence of hydromorphic properties was not defined because it was not possible to separate them at the scale of the Soil Map of the World. It is the case for Fluvisols, Regosols, Luvic Kastanozems, Luvic Chernozems and Nitosols. In the Soil Map of the European Communities (CEC, 1985), several subdivisions were added:

If the soil name can give information about the presence of hydromorphic properties and their depth of appearance, it gives no information about the duration of the saturation by water periods.

In the Digital Soil Map of the World, there is a rule for drainage estimation based on FAO soil name, topsoil texture, slope and phases (Table 4-24). The estimation gives a repartition in % to each drainage class that enables calculation of areas.

Table 4-24: FAO rule for estimation of drainage class

The FAO rule for drainage class on the part of the SGDBE where soil names were given in the FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend was evaluated. For each occurrence of the rule, the values taken by the WR attribute (except when WR = 0) were counted (Table 4-25). All the occurrences for which we have WR values show a good correlation with WR:

• with a good estimation (in bold)

• with a bad estimation (in light grey): An estimation is considered as bad if the dominant FAO drainage class doesn’t correspond to the WR value, or if there are two classes having equal percentage, even if one corresponds to the WR value.

Topsoil texture, slope and phase don’t show an impact on WR values.

Table 4-25: WR values for each occurrence of the FAO rule for drainage for STUs with an original soil name in FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend (in % of the number of STUs by occurrence)

Attribute FAO90-FULL

In the FAO-UNESCO 1990 legend, the water regime of soils is described by:

The different soil names for which one or more of these characteristics are present or are not allowed, are listed in Table 4-26.

Table 4-26: Moisture regime information contained in the definition of soil names in the FAO-UNESCO 1990 legend

Gleyic and stagnic properties refer to soil material which is saturated with water at some periods of the year, or throughout the year, in most years, and which show evidence of reduction processes or of reduction and segregation of iron. Gleyic properties are related to saturation by groundwater. Stagnic properties are related to saturation by surface water within 50 cm.

Attribute WRB-FULL

In WRB the water regime is described by:

Gleyic properties refer to soil materials which are, at least temporarily, completely saturated with groundwater for a period that allows reducing conditions to occur and show a gleyic colour pattern. Stagnic properties refer to soil materials which are completely saturated with surface water for a period long enough to allow reducing conditions to occur and show a stagnic colour pattern.

Attributes AGLIM1 and AGLIM2

Several phases are related with the water regime of the soils: drained, fragipan, flooded, phreatic. The drained phase has no definition, and becomes ‘excessively drained’ in the Instructions guide for version 4.0. When looking at the STUs having a dominant phase drained, all the values for WR are represented; the values 1, 2 and 3 are representing each of them around 30% of these STUs, the value 4 representing 8%. There is a low correlation between the phase drained and the water regime showing its bad quality. It is proposed to ignore this value in the rule.

The fragipan phase is defined in the FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend. It marks soils which have the upper level of the fragipan occurring within 100 cm from the soil surface. A fragipan is a loamy (uncommonly a sandy) subsurface horizon which has a high bulk density relative to the horizons above it. It is slowly to very slowly permeable.

The flooded phase has no definition.

The phreatic phase is defined in the FAO-UNESCO 1974 legend. It marks soils which have a groundwater table between 3 and 5 m from the soil surface. At this depth the presence of a groundwater is not normally reflected in the morphology of the solum; however, its presence is important for the water regime of the soil.

The petrocalcic phase marks soils in which the upper part of a petrocalcic horizon occurs within 100 cm from the soil surface (FAO-UNESCO, 1974). The petrocalcic horizon is a continuous cemented or indurated calcic horizon. The hydraulic conductivity is moderately slow to very slow.

When the current CGMS rule for drainage was evaluated, it appears that phases have often a high variability for the WR attribute. In this case it is proposed not to use them for estimating the drainage class.

 

Top PageTop Page
Previous PagePrevious Page - Next PageNext Page

MARS STATEuropean Commission Directorate General Joint Research CentreIES - Institute for Environment and Sustainability IPSC - Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen